Chips' share of the stack's gross profit
The chip layer's share of the AI stack's gross profit per calendar quarter: NVIDIA and AMD whole-company gross profit (filed) over that plus Microsoft Intelligent Cloud's gross profit (filed) and the frontier labs' estimated gross profit (grade C). Derived metric gross_profit_share_by_layer, chips slice.
Reason through thisThe reading
The site's main measure of who keeps the money, and so far the chip makers are keeping more of it. The total includes an estimate for OpenAI and Anthropic, so a revision to that estimate can move the share even when no company files anything new; a second chart, built only from filed operating income, is the check.
6 readings drawn from the derived metric gross_profit_share_by_layer; 43 observations in the evidence.
Derived (gross_profit_share_by_layer) from: SEC EDGAR XBRL company facts; Epoch AI data hub — AI companies; SEC EDGAR 10-Q/10-K XBRL instances (segment data). SEC EDGAR, XBRL company facts API. Epoch AI, 'Data on AI Companies' (CC BY 4.0), epoch.ai/data. SEC EDGAR, inline XBRL filings (segment disclosures).
Why it matters
Gross profit is what is left after paying to deliver the product, so a layer's share of it is the plainest answer to who keeps the money. If rents migrate up the stack as models commoditise, this share falls; if the scarce part stays scarce, it holds or rises.
What cuts against it
NVIDIA and AMD are whole-company figures, so gaming and PC chips count as AI; only one cloud segment files its cost of revenue; the lab slice is an estimate that overstates true gross margin; applications publish nothing usable and are left out, which flatters every measured layer's share.
How it is measured
- derived metric
gross_profit_share_by_layer(formula in the semantic layer) - source Epoch AI data hub — AI companies · default tier 5 · CC BY 4.0
- source SEC EDGAR 10-Q/10-K XBRL instances (segment data) · default tier 4 · Public domain (U.S. government); fair-access policy requires a descriptive User-Agent
- source SEC EDGAR XBRL company facts · default tier 4 · Public domain (U.S. government); fair-access policy requires a descriptive User-Agent
- proxy market_structure · cadence quarterly
Four calendar quarters, the same rule as the operating-income stack; a move under two points is fiscal-calendar noise. Rising = profit concentrating at the chip layer; falling = migrating up the stack.
Applied to metric:gross_profit_share_by_layer.
Derived rows (6)
| as of | dims | value | inputs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-30 | filed compute_semis | 72.6% | sources123+13 more |
| 2026-03-31 | filed compute_semis | 73.6% | sources123+7 more |
| 2025-12-31 | filed compute_semis | 71.8% | sources123+13 more |
| 2025-09-30 | filed compute_semis | 69.6% | sources123+7 more |
| 2025-06-30 | filed compute_semis | 65.7% | sources123+13 more |
| 2025-03-31 | filed compute_semis | 63.9% | sources123+7 more |
Latest readings
Why this status, and its history
Evaluator: 69.5% (Epoch AI data hub — AI companies, 2026-06-30) reads concentrating over 4 periods with a dead band of 0.02. Auto-reason; rule rationale: Four calendar quarters, the same rule as the operating-income stack; a move under two points is fiscal-calendar noise. Rising = profit concentrating at the chip layer; falling = migrating up the stack.
- 2026-09-14unmeasured to concentratingconf — → 60 · the evaluator (automatic)
Evaluator: 69.5% (Epoch AI data hub — AI companies, 2026-06-30) reads concentrating over 4 periods with a dead band of 0.02. Auto-reason; rule rationale: Four calendar quarters, the same rule as the operating-income stack; a move under two points is fiscal-calendar noise. Rising = profit concentrating at the chip layer; falling = migrating up the stack.
Why this confidence
Rests on 43 observations from Epoch AI data hub — AI companies, SEC EDGAR 10-Q/10-K XBRL instances (segment data), SEC EDGAR XBRL company facts; best evidence tier 4, grade A; current.
Confidence is independent of status: 90–95 multiple strong independent sources; 70–89 good evidence, some ambiguity; 50–69 mixed or hard to operationalise; 0–49 limited or vague evidence.
Predictions that lean on this
- Not happeningProfit moves up to the labs · This site
- Both sides expect this