Skip to content
Slow Variables
Ask

Compute & physical

Non-Nvidia share of AI compute shipped (H100-equivalents)

Non-Nvidia designers' share of cumulative AI compute shipped, in H100-equivalents, on each quarter end that every designer has reported, from Epoch's chip-sales estimates. Derived metric custom_silicon_share.

Reason through this

The reading

Google's TPUs are internal, not sold, so the share overstates merchant competition; the direction still says whether the chokepoint is being routed around.

Direction over the last 5 readingseach dot links to its record
in the rule's windowearliermoves within ±2.0 pts read as stable, and a move counts only if more than half the steps go its way; this window moved +1.8 pts and 3 of 4 steps rose; higher reads dispersing
estimate

10 readings drawn from the derived metric custom_silicon_share; 60 observations in the evidence.

Derived (custom_silicon_share) from: Epoch AI chip sales. Epoch AI, AI Chip Sales (CC BY 4.0).

The numbers
as ofreadingvaluerecord
2026-06-30—33.8%estimate
2026-03-31—32.8%estimate
2025-12-31—33.0%estimate
2025-09-30—32.9%estimate
2025-06-30—32.0%estimate
2025-03-31—30.9%estimate
2024-12-31—29.6%estimate
2024-09-30—27.1%estimate
2024-06-30—23.6%estimate
2024-03-31—19.1%estimate

Why it matters

The leading indicator of Nvidia rent decay; TPUs, Trainium and AMD are the routes around the chokepoint.

What cuts against it

Epoch's estimates carry 5th-95th percentile ranges of a third or more; cumulative shares move slowly by construction.

How it is measured
  • derived metric custom_silicon_share (formula in the semantic layer)
  • source Epoch AI chip sales · default tier 6 · CC BY 4.0
  • proxy market_structure · cadence quarterly

Four quarters; under two points is inside Epoch's estimate ranges. Rising non-Nvidia share = the chip layer's rent dispersing.

Applied to metric:custom_silicon_share.

Derived rows (10)
as ofdimsvalueinputs
2026-06-3033.8%sources123+3 more
2026-03-3132.8%sources123+3 more
2025-12-3133.0%sources123+3 more
2025-09-3032.9%sources123+3 more
2025-06-3032.0%sources123+3 more
2025-03-3130.9%sources123+3 more
2024-12-3129.6%sources123+3 more
2024-09-3027.1%sources123+3 more
2024-06-3023.6%sources123+3 more
2024-03-3119.1%sources123+3 more
Latest readings
  • 2026-06-30 · 33.8%as of 2026-06-30(6 obs)
  • 2026-03-31 · 32.8%as of 2026-03-31(6 obs)
  • 2025-12-31 · 33.0%as of 2025-12-31(6 obs)
  • 2025-09-30 · 32.9%as of 2025-09-30(6 obs)
  • 2025-06-30 · 32.0%as of 2025-06-30(6 obs)
  • 2025-03-31 · 30.9%as of 2025-03-31(6 obs)
Why this status, and its history

The share is now read only on quarters every designer has reported, as the designer-concentration index is: 32.8% at 31 Dec 2025, with all six reported. The earlier reason quoted 26% at the end of March 2026, a quarter only three of the six had reported, so the share appeared to fall seven points; among those three it fell less than half a point, and the full panel's March quarter is not yet known. Over the four quarters to December 2025 the full-panel share rose from 29.6% to 32.8%, which the direction rule reads as dispersing, but Epoch is the one source and not a primary one, so the two-source rule holds the status at emerging.

  1. 2026-09-23emerging to emergingconf 50 → 50 · Claude (model)

    The share is now read only on quarters every designer has reported, as the designer-concentration index is: 32.8% at 31 Dec 2025, with all six reported. The earlier reason quoted 26% at the end of March 2026, a quarter only three of the six had reported, so the share appeared to fall seven points; among those three it fell less than half a point, and the full panel's March quarter is not yet known. Over the four quarters to December 2025 the full-panel share rose from 29.6% to 32.8%, which the direction rule reads as dispersing, but Epoch is the one source and not a primary one, so the two-source rule holds the status at emerging.

    Weighed against it: Epoch's estimates carry wide ranges, and the newest full panel lags the newest partial one by up to three quarters, so the reading is already old when it lands.

    sources123456
  2. 2026-09-10unmeasured to emergingconf — → 50 · the evaluator (automatic)

    Epoch's chip-sales estimates: non-Nvidia designers (Google TPU, AMD, Amazon, Huawei, Cambricon) held about a third of cumulative H100-equivalent compute shipped through 2025 and 26% at end-March 2026 as Nvidia's Blackwell ramp outpaced them, so the direction reads concentrating in the chip layer. Single tier-6 source with wide estimate ranges caps the status at emerging. Initial seed.

    sources123
Why this confidence

Rests on 60 observations from Epoch AI chip sales; best evidence tier 6, grade C; current.

Confidence is independent of status: 90–95 multiple strong independent sources; 70–89 good evidence, some ambiguity; 50–69 mixed or hard to operationalise; 0–49 limited or vague evidence.

Predictions that lean on this