Adaptation · Labour & consumers
California unemployment claims from AI-exposed occupations
1What this measures
Month-on-month change in the three-month moving average of new initial unemployment claims from high-AI-exposure occupations in California (potential-exposure measure), from the California Policy Lab and EDD tracker.
Why it matters. Administrative claims data, not a survey and not a profile scrape; the closest thing to a real-time separations signal.
- Proxy types
- deployment, welfare
- Unit
- share
- Cadence
- monthly
- Valve
- adoption to adaptation
2How we track this
- series
cait.ca_high_exposure.claims_3mma_mom.m - series
edd.ca_high_exposure.claims_3mma_mom.m - source California AI-Unemployment Tracker (CAIT) · default tier 6 · California Policy Lab
- source California EDD, AI and the economy · default tier 4 · Public record (State of California)
- Normal band
- ≤ 2.0%
- Fast band
- ≥ 5.0%
- Falsifying
- —
Normal = monthly moves of up to 2% in the smoothed series, the noise floor of claims data; fast = 5% or more month on month, sustained. Between is `emerging`.
Applied to edd.ca_high_exposure.claims_3mma_mom.m.
3Tracker interpretation
Claims from exposed occupations are drifting up about a percent a month, in line with California's overall labour market, not ahead of it.
4Evidence
5Status and reasoning
California AI-Unemployment Tracker, July 2026 data (California Policy Lab; identical release on the EDD site): the 3-month moving average of high-AI-exposure initial claims rose about 1.0% month on month (52,300 to 52,800). Inside the normal band (<=2%). Initial seed.
6Timeline notes
- 2026-07-31 ca_high_exposure · 1.0%as of 2026-07-31
7Counterevidence
What cuts against this reading
One state; exposure measured at occupation level; claims respond to the business cycle first.
8Update history
- 2026-09-10unmeasured to consistent with normalconf — → 70 · claude-initial-seed
California AI-Unemployment Tracker, July 2026 data (California Policy Lab; identical release on the EDD site): the 3-month moving average of high-AI-exposure initial claims rose about 1.0% month on month (52,300 to 52,800). Inside the normal band (<=2%). Initial seed.
9Confidence
70 / 95 — good evidence, some ambiguity
Confidence is independent of status: 90–95 multiple strong independent sources; 70–89 good evidence, some ambiguity; 50–69 mixed or hard to operationalise; below 50 limited or vague.
10Related
- Cross-tracker concordance (labour) consistent with normal
- Crosswalk: Adaptation ⇄ Labour & consumers (same valve)