Skip to content
Slow Variables
Ask
Census · Engineering · occupation code 17-3025

Environmental Engineering Technologists and Technicians

Every task in this role, whether it passes the census's structural hand-over screen, which models pass it, and why. It is a screen, not a claim about what AI can do: a task can pass and still be beyond the systems of the day. The stricter and looser rules re-vote every task, and small differences between roles are noise.

Passes the screen · 0 of 26 tasks

No task in this role passes the screen.

Does not pass

  • Perform environmental quality work in field or office settings.

    physical work, outside the screen · 8.1% of the role's time · $57.4M

  • Record laboratory or field data, including numerical data, test results, photographs, or summaries of visual observations.

    reason given most often: no existing check settles it · 7.0% of the role's time · $50.0M · passed by Claude Sonnet · the models disagreed · waiting on a check

  • Maintain project logbook records or computer program files.

    reason given most often: no existing check settles it · 6.8% of the role's time · $48.4M · passed by Claude Sonnet · the models disagreed · waiting on a check

  • Decontaminate or test field equipment used to clean or test pollutants from soil, air, or water.

    physical work, outside the screen · 6.8% of the role's time · $48.1M

  • Collect and analyze pollution samples, such as air or ground water.

    physical work, outside the screen · 6.7% of the role's time · $47.8M

  • Produce environmental assessment reports, tabulating data and preparing charts, graphs, or sketches.

    reason given most often: no existing check settles it · 6.6% of the role's time · $47.0M

  • Receive, set up, test, or decontaminate equipment.

    physical work, outside the screen · 5.8% of the role's time · $41.2M

  • Review technical documents to ensure completeness and conformance to requirements.

    reason given most often: no existing check settles it, and a failure is too expensive · 4.9% of the role's time · $34.6M · passed by Claude Sonnet · the models disagreed

  • Prepare and package environmental samples for shipping or testing.

    physical work, outside the screen · 4.6% of the role's time · $32.5M

  • Maintain process parameters and evaluate process anomalies.

    reason given most often: nobody can tell quickly whether it worked, and no existing check settles it · 3.9% of the role's time · $27.9M

  • Review work plans to schedule activities.

    reason given most often: nobody can tell quickly whether it worked, and no existing check settles it · 3.7% of the role's time · $26.0M

  • Inspect facilities to monitor compliance with regulations governing substances, such as asbestos, lead, or wastewater.

    physical work, outside the screen · 3.3% of the role's time · $23.6M

  • Assess the ability of environments to naturally remove or reduce conventional or emerging contaminants from air, water, or soil.

    reason given most often: nobody can tell quickly whether it worked, and no existing check settles it, and a failure is too expensive · 3.2% of the role's time · $22.5M

  • Work with customers to assess the environmental impact of proposed construction or to develop pollution prevention programs.

    reason given most often: nobody can tell quickly whether it worked, and no existing check settles it, and a failure is too expensive · 3.0% of the role's time · $21.7M

  • Perform statistical analysis and correction of air or water pollution data submitted by industry or other agencies.

    reason given most often: a failure is too expensive · 3.0% of the role's time · $21.3M · passed by Claude Sonnet · the models disagreed

  • Oversee support staff.

    reason given most often: nobody can tell quickly whether it worked, and no existing check settles it · 3.0% of the role's time · $21.2M

  • Assist in the cleanup of hazardous material spills.

    physical work, outside the screen · 3.0% of the role's time · $21.0M

  • Develop work plans, including writing specifications or establishing material, manpower, or facilities needs.

    reason given most often: nobody can tell quickly whether it worked, and no existing check settles it · 2.7% of the role's time · $19.2M

  • Evaluate and select technologies to clean up polluted sites, restore polluted air, water, or soil, or rehabilitate degraded ecosystems.

    reason given most often: nobody can tell quickly whether it worked, and no existing check settles it, and a failure is too expensive · 2.5% of the role's time · $17.8M

  • Prepare permit applications or review compliance with environmental permits.

    reason given most often: nobody can tell quickly whether it worked, and no existing check settles it, and a failure is too expensive · 2.5% of the role's time · $17.6M

  • Provide technical engineering support in the planning of projects, such as wastewater treatment plants, to ensure compliance with environmental regulations and policies.

    reason given most often: nobody can tell quickly whether it worked, and no existing check settles it, and a failure is too expensive · 2.2% of the role's time · $15.7M

  • Obtain product information, identify vendors or suppliers, or order materials or equipment to maintain inventory.

    reason given most often: nobody can tell quickly whether it worked, and no existing check settles it · 1.8% of the role's time · $12.5M

  • Arrange for the disposal of lead, asbestos, or other hazardous materials.

    physical work, outside the screen · 1.7% of the role's time · $12.4M

  • Model biological, chemical, or physical treatment processes to remove or degrade pollutants.

    reason given most often: nobody can tell quickly whether it worked, and no existing check settles it, and a failure is too expensive · 1.5% of the role's time · $10.7M

  • Improve chemical processes to reduce toxic emissions.

    reason given most often: nobody can tell quickly whether it worked, and no existing check settles it, and a failure is too expensive · 1.1% of the role's time · $8.0M

  • Create models to demonstrate or predict the process by which pollutants move through or impact an environment.

    reason given most often: nobody can tell quickly whether it worked, and no existing check settles it, and a failure is too expensive · 0.7% of the role's time · $4.7M

Where this role works